Themen der aktuellen Ausgaben

 

A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients.


A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients.

Rhodes A, Cusack RJ, Newman PJ, et al.                                                                                                         Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:256-64

Department of Intensive Care, St George´s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK

OBJECTIVES: To compare the survival and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients treated with the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to those treated without the use of a PAC.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial from October 1997 to February 1999.
SETTING: Adult intensive care unit at a large teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Two hundred one critically ill patients were randomised either to a PAC group (n=95) or the control group (n=106). One patient in the control group was withdrawn from the study and five patients in the PAC group did not receive a PAC. All participants were available for follow-up.
INTERVETIONS: Participants were assigned to be managed either with the use of a PAC (PAC group) or without the use of a PAC (control group).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival to 28 days, intensive care and hospital length of stay and organ dysfunction were compared on an intention-to-treat basis and also on a subgroup basis for those participants who successfully received a PAC.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mortality between the PAC group [46/95 (47.9%)] and the control group [50/106 (47.6)] (95% confidence intervals for the difference -13 to 14%, p>0.99). The mortality for participants who had management decisions based on information derived from a PAC was 41/91 (45%, 95% confidence intervals -11 to 16%, p=0.77). The PAC group had significantly more fluids in the first 24 h (4953 (3140, 7000) versus 4292 (2535, 6049) ml) and an increased incidence of renal failure (35 versus 20% of patients at day 3 post randomisation p<0.05) and thrombocytopenia (p<0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the PAC is not associated with an increased mortality.


Rhodes et al. ergänzen die Debatte um Risiko und Nutzen des Pulmonaliskatheters bei Intensivpatienten erstmals mit Daten einer prospektiven, randomisierten Studie. Die Fragestellung war spätestens 1996 mit einer methodisch umstrittenen nicht-randomisierten Studie von Connors et al., die eine erhöhte 180-Tage-Mortalität von Patienten mit Pulmonaliskatheter gegenüber einer gematchten Kontrollgruppe gezeigt hatte, brisant geworden.

Melden Sie sich an um weiter zu lesen ...

Tags: intensiv-news pneumologie pulmonalartherienkatheter 

© Medicom VerlagsgmbH

 
Medicom

Wir wollen Fachärzte und Pfleger topaktuell und wissenschaftlich fundiert über Studien, fachspezifische Entwicklungen und deren praktische Umsetzung informieren, um sie in ihrer Arbeit und Fortbildung zu unterstützen.

Wählen Sie dazu bitte Ihr Land aus.

  • ÖsterreichÖsterreich
  • ÖsterreichDeutschland
  • ÖsterreichSchweiz
  • ÖsterreichAndere