INTENSIV-News
Jury members:
P. Suter (Chairman), A. Armaganidis, F. Beaufils, X.
Bonfill, H. Burchardi, D. Cook, A. Fagot-Largeault, L. Thijs, S.
Vesconi, A. Williams
Scientic advisors: J.R. Le Gall, R. Chang
Introduction
The
purpose of intensive care medicine is to diagnose and treat patients
with acute life threatening illness, and to restore their previous
health and quality of life. Care of the critically ill patients has
become increasingly complex over the last two decades. Modern
technologic advances now enable us to manage previously terminal
conditions and patients can be kept alive for weeks or months, even when
their prognosis is dismal. As reasonable hope of recovery fades, the
health care team confronts another obligation: to help the dying achieve
a peaceful and dignified death. The costs of intensive care include
direct and indirect costs, opportunity costs and intangible costs such
as human suffering. In addition to medical factors, individual and
societal values, ethical, legal and economic issues increasingly affect
the delivery of intensive care. An escalating proportion of health care
money is spent on a small percentage of hospitalized patients in the ICU
during their last few days of life. The appropriate allocation of
limited resources available should be considered when decisions are
made.
For more than a decade, intensive care physicians and
clinical investigators have developed various scoring systems in an
effort to make better use of collective clinical experience in the ICU,
and to address questions of effectiveness, efficiency, equity and
quality of intensive care. Although scoring systems have also been
created to measure the intensity and effectiveness of therapeutic
interventions, nursing needs, and patient and family satisfaction with
ICU services provided, most attention has been focused on the
development and use of illness severity scores. At present, three such
scoring systems are in widespread use: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Severity of
illness is most often defined as the estinated probability of hospital
mortality. Illness severity scores have been proposed for predicting
outcome for critically ill patients, to improve resource allocation and
to assist in clinical decision making.
In formulating this
report, the jury of this Consensus Conference synthesized evidence
published in the medical literature and data presented by the Conference
speakers.
Wir wollen Fachärzte und Pfleger topaktuell und wissenschaftlich fundiert über Studien, fachspezifische Entwicklungen und deren praktische Umsetzung informieren, um sie in ihrer Arbeit und Fortbildung zu unterstützen.
Wählen Sie dazu bitte Ihr Land aus.